How to Install an EMC Cable Gland: Step-by-Step Guide
Eight-step field procedure for EMC cable gland installation: screen exposure, braid fold-over, torque, enclosure bonding and the continuity check that proves the shield is bonded.
Read More
The question “which gland do I need for Zone 1?” is usually asked backwards. A Zone 1 cable gland is not a product family you pick from a catalogue: it is the smallest set of glands whose certification covers the zone your area classification drawing has already assigned to that point on site.
The zone is a site decision, not a product feature. It sets a minimum equipment protection level (EPL), a group and a temperature class, and the gland either carries a marking covering all three or it does not. This guide covers what a Zone 1 gland must satisfy, what changes in Zone 2, how dust zones differ, and the errors that show up most often on operating plants. For the background, see what an explosion proof cable gland does.
Four requirements apply, and the zone sets only the first.
The gland must also match the enclosure it enters: protection concept, entry thread form and size, and cable construction. A thread that does not fully engage is not a compliant entry even when the gland is certified, which is why thread form is confirmed before ordering.
| Zone | Minimum EPL | What the gland marking must show | Typical location |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zone 0 | Ga | Not a cable gland application for power circuits | Inside tanks, vapour space |
| Zone 1 | Gb | Gb or Ga, group, temperature class, IP | Process areas, compressor houses, sample points |
| Zone 2 | Gc | Gc, Gb or Ga, group, temperature class, IP | Storage, perimeter, ventilation-adjacent areas |
| Zone 21 | Db | Db or Da, dust group, IP6X | Dust handling, milling, powder transfer |
| Zone 22 | Dc | Dc, Db or Da, dust group, IP6X | Bagging, grain, peripheral dust areas |
Zone 0 is outside the range of a standard power cable gland; it calls for the highest level of protection and is normally served by intrinsically safe circuits. Zones 1, 2, 21 and 22 are where cable entries are actually specified.


Zones come from area classification, which is the site’s work rather than the supplier’s: IEC 60079-10-1 for gas, IEC 60079-10-2 for dust. In the EU that duty sits with the employer under the worker protection directive — a different instrument from the equipment directive the gland is certified against, as the ATEX and IECEx comparison explains.
A zone gives a location’s minimum EPL. It does not give you:
Between Zone 1 and Zone 2, one line of the specification changes: the EPL floor. Zone 1 requires Gb; Zone 2 requires Gc, which also makes Gb and Ga equipment acceptable there. Group, temperature class, ingress protection, thread and cable compatibility are unchanged.
A Zone 2 area may therefore be served by lighter, cheaper hardware, but only where the classification genuinely holds. Glands near flanges, vents, drains and fill points sit where gas collects, and those points are often reclassified upwards at the next drawing review. A Gb version and a Gc version of the same gland usually look identical as well, so check the marking rather than the box.
A marking carries group and EPL alongside the concept: Ex db IIC Gb for a flameproof entry rated for Zone 1, Ex ec IIC Gc for an increased safety entry limited to Zone 2. A marking that cannot be read after installation, because it was painted over or turned away from the inspection position, cannot be verified in an audit. The Ex d and Ex e comparison covers why the enclosure rather than the zone chooses between the two concepts.
Zone 2 and Zone 22 read alike and are not. The number alone is not enough to specify from.
| Point of difference | Gas zone (Zone 2) | Dust zone (Zone 22) |
|---|---|---|
| Hazardous medium | Flammable gas or vapour | Combustible dust or flyings |
| Group marking | IIA, IIB or IIC | IIIA, IIIB or IIIC |
| Ingress requirement | Set by the environment | Dust-tight, IP6X |
| Temperature assessment | Temperature class T1 to T6 | Maximum surface temperature, plus dust layer build-up |
A gas group approval is not a dust group approval: dust zones add an ingress requirement a gas-only gland may not carry, and conductive dust is treated more severely because it can bridge insulation.


Treating “Zone 1 means Ex d, Zone 2 means Ex e” as a rule. It is not one. Both concepts exist at EPL Gb, and the enclosure, not the zone, picks between them.
Reading Zone 2 as permission to skip certification. Zone 2 lowers the required EPL, it does not remove it. IP68 without an Ex marking is not a hazardous area gland.
| Mistake | What the requirement actually says | Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| The zone picks the concept | The enclosure picks the concept; the zone sets the minimum EPL | Concept mismatch at the entry, invalidating the enclosure rating |
| Zone 2 treated as Zone 22 | Gas and dust groups, ingress and temperature rules all differ | Non-compliant entry in a dust area |
| Zone 2 needs no Ex marking | Zone 2 requires EPL Gc at minimum | Uncertified equipment in a classified area |
| Higher EPL is always better | The entry must preserve the enclosure’s concept | Unnecessary cost, unresolved mismatch |
The most common under-specification in Zone 2 is a compression gland on a cable that lets gas travel through the core. Whether a barrier is needed depends on the cable and on whether the enclosure volume makes an internal explosion credible, not on the zone number.
If a cable can pass gas along its core into a flameproof enclosure, a barrier type is called for in Zone 1 or Zone 2 alike. If it cannot, a compression type is normally sufficient in either zone, provided the EPL, group and ingress requirements are met.
Real plants are rarely uniform: a Zone 1 pocket around a compressor or sampling point usually sits inside a larger Zone 2 area, and both sit inside the unclassified balance of the site.
| Strategy | Benefit | Risk | Suited to |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single SKU at the highest EPL on site | One part number, no wrong substitution, simpler spares | Pays a premium on entries that only need Gc | Plants with a small Zone 1 pocket and many Zone 2 entries |
| Zone-matched SKUs | Lower material cost, tighter specification | Two similar parts in one store; substitution errors | Sites with strict stores control and clear labelling |
| Mixed, with physical segregation | Balances cost against control | Depends on the segregation being maintained | Most operating plants |
The usual compromise is to standardise on the highest EPL in use at that location, accept the small premium, then keep lower-rated items physically separate and labelled. Relying on an installer to read a marking is a weak control, especially when the marking is only legible before the gland is fitted.
Once the zone is fixed it also fixes the inspection regime: under IEC 60079-17 the schedule is risk-driven, so higher-risk zones are inspected more often and in more detail. Cable entries are among the defects inspection finds most often.
Inspectors look for predictable things: seal damage, a thread that is not fully engaged, armour that was never clamped, a missing shroud or earth tag, a gland the wrong size for the cable, and a marking painted over during maintenance.
Three habits prevent most of it:
Most procurement failures are specification failures. A hazardous area gland order should carry every line below; anything left blank will be assumed by the supplier.
| Specification line | Source of the value | Example entry |
|---|---|---|
| Zone and medium | Area classification drawing | Zone 1, gas |
| Minimum EPL | Zone | Gb |
| Protection concept | Enclosure | Ex db |
| Gas or dust group | Process gas or dust data | IIC |
| Temperature class or ambient range | Gas data and site conditions | Per the gas data for the duty |
| Entry thread form and size | Enclosure entry | M20 x 1.5 |
| Cable construction and OD range | Measured cable | Armoured, within the gland’s stated range |
| Ingress protection | Environment and dust group | IP66 or IP68 |
| Barrier or non-barrier | Cable construction and enclosure volume | As the cable schedule requires |
| Material | Corrosion environment | Nickel-plated brass or 316L stainless steel |
| Certificate evidence | Purchase requirement | ATEX and IECEx certificate references |
Certified glands ship with their certificate and material documentation; the CMP explosion proof gland range is one example of the documentation set an Ex order should include. An order that names a certificate rather than a marketing description is far easier to verify on delivery.
Start with the drawing, not the catalogue. Pull the zone, group and temperature class for the location, confirm the enclosure’s concept and entry thread, then specify against those values. Suitable glands are available in nickel-plated brass for most onshore service and in stainless steel where chlorides, sour service or washdown are present; a representative entry is the PG42 gland for hazardous areas. If the zone boundary on your drawing is ambiguous, settle that classification question before ordering.
Not if it is marked Gc only. Zone 1 requires at least EPL Gb, so a Gc-marked gland is inadmissible regardless of its IP rating or material. If the same gland exists in a Gb-marked version, that is the version for a Zone 1 entry.
Not quite. “Explosion proof” describes a protection approach, usually flameproof Ex d. A Zone 1 gland is defined by its EPL, so it may be flameproof, increased safety or another concept rated at Gb. Zone 1 is the requirement; flameproof is one way to meet it.
No. A barrier is required where gas or vapour can migrate through the cable into the enclosure, which is a property of the cable construction and the enclosure rather than of the zone. A Zone 1 entry on a suitable filled cable may not need one; a Zone 2 entry on an unfilled multi-core cable may well need one.
Zone 2 is a gas zone: an explosive gas atmosphere is not expected during normal operation and, if it occurs, lasts only briefly. Zone 22 is a dust zone with the same expectation about frequency. They differ in group marking, in the ingress protection needed for dust, and in how surface temperature is assessed.
Only if it also carries Ex certification for that zone. IP68 addresses water and dust ingress and says nothing about ignition risk. Many glands are both IP68 and Ex certified; the Ex marking is the part that qualifies an entry for a hazardous area.